-
Website
http://www.gomediazine.com/ -
Original page
http://www.gomediazine.com/rants/death-to-creatives/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Mike_R
9 comments · 1 points
-
TiffanyForrester
37 comments · 1 points
-
TenTonBooks
44 comments · 1 points
-
Adam_Wagner
44 comments · 3 points
-
michaela77
16 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Help us decide: What Templates are next?
1 week ago · 24 comments
-
ForeverSave: Versioned File Backup for Mac
2 weeks ago · 43 comments
-
Weapons of Mass Creation Video Interview: Horsebites
1 week ago · 12 comments
-
How to Create Fanatics as a T-Shirt Designer
3 weeks ago · 11 comments
-
Interview with Illustrator Godmachine
3 weeks ago · 10 comments
-
Help us decide: What Templates are next?
Good post.
I use "Designer" as well. "Graphic Designer" sounds so cheap and generic now.
"Designer" is loaded enough to convey most of that, I guess. I'm better with a job description than title, though.
Although saying that you are a designer is kind of vague (could be a fashion designer, interior designer…), telling someone that you are a designer is a great way to start a conversation/pitch to potential clients.
Yeah! Right on, brother!
My answer - “Everything.”
simply wonderful.
Anyway, regarding you initial statement about creative not being a noun. You are wrong. English words are defined by their use and are not restricted to their perceived original meaning. That's the way it has always been and probably (hopefully) the way it will always be.
Last paragraph, first line: "What exactly do for a living?"
Which is related to "It's going to take you HOW LONG to design that logo/brochure/web site?!"
We're more misunderstood than writers and studio artists...
alas, I have become accustomed to the worst term ever, established by men in suits who don't know anything about creativity in itself.
i now fully back this article. i too describe myself as the broad term of "designer"... although followed up with "everything but interior decorating."
Using "graphic" before "designer" does seem to irk me a bit, but maybe that's because I think of "graphic" in terms of describing mathematics and science rather than art, which is what I compare "design" to. That is, I always think of "graphs" (charts), "geographic" (study of geography -- the earth's surface), and the idea that the main use of graphics is to simply educate, regardless of how well the graphic is rendered. Design requires much more thought and planning, as well as skill and talent.
I'm no industrial designer, I don't design objects. I'm not an artist, I design for a purpose and a goal. I do advertisement, typography, web, video, print, etc - all kinds of communication media. So i find this term pretty accurate. It's not pretentious, it's nothing like "I make dreams come true", it's just a good and plain explanation of what I do:
I design communication media. I'm a media designer.
Woot woot.
I'm going to be the only one on here to say, yup, I have (and am currently because I haven't changed the text on my website for ages) called myself a creative. Which I am slightly embarrassed about now.
creative - From the Oxford English Dictionary
• adjective: involving the use of the imagination or original ideas in order to create something.
"I am creative", with the correct grammer is better, it works "I am involving the use of my imagination to create something"...but possibly in the same league as "artsy-fartsy" (which is how my mum understands what I do).
I don't think theres much wrong with using the word, if you use it right.
It encompasses the fact that I am more than a designer, artist, photographer, whatever...to create something, whether its for a client, for me, or for the hell of it.
Nick Botner might have it though. "I offer Creative Services"
To which the reply would be, "Like what?"
And I will say "Whatever you want."
Great post, and was what I was starting to think. Cheers Adam
Later that day he gave me a sample of his work - a beautifully glazed tea cup.
He asked me if I make things - I said yes.
"Live ART! It's not a choice anymore"
Death to "Creatives" =]
To "Google" now quite obviously means to search on the internet.
To "text" has become synonymous with creating an SMS.
Dude, if small things like this make you uptight at your age now, I hate to see you as a grumpy old man!
/tongueincheek
i'm in he lucky position i can call myself "creative director" or "technical director" (or both) :)
if people are still stuck for what to call themselves, try: http://www.generatorland.com/glgenerator.aspx?i...
Really people. You know what the person meant... get over it. You sound like a bunch of whinging sorority girls (apologies to sorority girls).
To HWS... design IS a noun!
Noun: design di'zIn
A preliminary sketch indicating the plan for something
Who are you trying to impress with this whinge? Do you want some cheese with that whine?
It was hilarious. Thanks for the great post!
But further to this topic, what's infurates me to no extent is the term "creative" used to describe the act of Blogging, Design concepts, or Copy. I've had numerouse clients ask me when 'they can expect the creative in' or want me to look 'at the creative for a campaign'. It's bonkers... What's wrong with asking when 'will the Blog Posts be up' or lets a 'look at our campaign posters?'
"What matters is what something is, not what it is called."
Words are the transportation for thought and therefore should be chosen correctly when written or orally expressed. But people give words life from their thoughts perhaps the word "creatives" is growing to encompass a larger definition because there is a greater mass perception of it that differs from the words official definition, so would it be wrong for the word to not reflect this? Haven't other words over time changed or evolved in definition to fit the most current perceptions of it?
"creatives" could be the new slang which represents something entirely different than its correctly defined counter part. As wrong or right as it may be. To limit our selves and our vocabulary's by rules and or limits put into place before our birth time is to me just a form of mental slavery.
But this article is very relevant to many of us who have given our lives to performing communication in anyway effectively and efficiently. If we can't convey ourselves right who will?
Closing comment: this site is awesome. great article.
Using the title of graphic designer means I definitely deal with visual information, symbols, and how they are formed and laid out for the human eye to decipher and, hopefully, enjoy. When I compile a website, I don't see the difference in what I'm doing today against what the typesetters of old did. The processes and the distribution methods have changed, but the goals of our profession remain the same.
Try and be a little more poetic. Using just "designer" makes me think of Gucci crackheads. I like "art director" though... feels more fresh than being a traditional graphic designer, and it rings better with other kinds of creative folks (bands/musicians, writers, et cetera). I put both on my business cards for good measure.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/creat...
Either way relax... it's just a word and we know what it's implying. It sucks that the article is inaccurate and I really don't think this was a great topic to write about on a website for "creatives".